Re: Choosing parallel_degree

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Choosing parallel_degree
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ51FYTBGfbstbfMn0C7_jKpk1+ck27UX-pUwbCC3Kk8g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Choosing parallel_degree  (Julien Rouhaud <julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com>)
Ответы Re: Choosing parallel_degree
Re: Choosing parallel_degree
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 6:31 PM, Julien Rouhaud
<julien.rouhaud@dalibo.com> wrote:
> On 11/04/2016 22:53, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
>> On 11/04/2016 17:44, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> We should probably add the number of workers actually obtained to the
>>> EXPLAIN ANALYZE output.  That's been requested before.
>>
>> If it's not too late for 9.6, it would be very great.
>
> Just in case I attach a patch to implement it. I'll add it to the next
> commitfest.

I think we should go with "Workers Planned" and "Workers Launched",
capitalized exactly that way, and lose "Number Of".

I would be inclined to view this as a reasonable 9.6 cleanup of
parallel query, but other people may wish to construe things more
strictly than I would.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SET ROLE and reserved roles
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold <