On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 7:43 PM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn@amazon.com> wrote:
> > shared_memory_size_in_huge_pages? It's kinda long, but a long name
> > that you can understand without reading the docs is better than a
> > short one where you can't.
>
> I think that's an improvement. The only other idea I have at the
> moment is num_huge_pages_required_for_shared_memory.
Hmm, that to me sounds like maybe only part of shared memory uses huge
pages and maybe we're just giving you the number required for that
part. I realize that it doesn't work that way but I don't know if
everyone will.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com