Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoZ-7mTbgbrHtZB8ipr5QadBDRn_dPZEomw1CF_O1EQL6A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [bug?] Missed parallel safety checks, and wrong parallel safety  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 9, 2021 at 2:43 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> There are specific cases where there's a good reason to worry.
> For example, if we assume blindly that domain_in() is parallel
> safe, we will have cause to regret that.  But I don't find that
> to be a reason why we need to lock down everything everywhere.
> We need to understand the tradeoffs involved in what we check,
> and apply checks that are likely to avoid problems, while not
> being too nanny-ish.

Yeah, that's exactly how I feel about it, too.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Multiple hosts in connection string failed to failover in non-hot standby mode
Следующее
От: Justin Pryzby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: when the startup process doesn't