Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 2:55 PM Andrei Lepikhov <lepihov@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 13/2/2025 01:40, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I was idly speculating yesterday about letting the Ryu code print
> > the division result, so that we get a variable number of digits.
> > Realistically, that'd probably result in many cases in more digits
> > than anybody wants, so it's not a serious proposal.  I'm cool with
> > the fixed-two-digits approach to start with.
> Okay, since no one else voted for the meaningful-numbers approach, I
> would say that fixed size is better than nothing. It may cover some of
> my practical cases, but unfortunately, not the most problematic ones.

I don't love it either, but I do think it is significantly better than nothing.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com