On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 7:55 PM Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> wrote:
> When reviewing a recent patch, I missed a place where Datum was being
> converted to another type implicitly (ie without going though a
> DatumGetXXX() macro). Thanks to Jeff for fixing that (commit
> b538c90b), but I was curious to see if I could convince my compiler to
> tell me about that sort of thing.
This is a very easy mistake to make, so if you ever feel like
returning to this topic in earnest, I think it could be a worthwhile
expenditure of time.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com