Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYvO3cVcG6dwjX=9+vHTd0RHJk5NCv-Abn1zseuixuzJg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote:
> Is anyone working on SET PERSISTENT?  I thought that got bike-shedded to
> death.

I think we had a fairly good sketch of how it could work mapped out,
mostly based around adding a postgresql.auto file.  I could dig up the
old discussions, if need be.

Basically, I'd be willing to get that implemented and bull it through
to completion in time for 9.2 if having that would make it easier for
everyone to accept the idea of turning the recovery.conf parameters
into GUCs.  Otherwise I probably will not get to it this cycle.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem