Re: fixing CREATEROLE
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: fixing CREATEROLE |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYq3VCEhKSH68WL++d=YFjq84DYz8etqVZ0gnEpJHpC_g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: fixing CREATEROLE ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: fixing CREATEROLE
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 5:16 PM David G. Johnston <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 1:29 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> But don't we need to add >> >> createrole_self_grant to the set of GUCs that pg_dump[all] >> resets in the emitted SQL? >> > > The other approach would be to do what we do for the role options and just specify everything explicitly in the dump. The GUC is only a default specifier so let's not leave room for defaults in the dump file. +1 for considering that option, although I am not sure which way is better. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: