On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Arthur Silva <arthurprs@gmail.com> wrote:
> In the other hand PG tuple overhead is already the largest among the
> alternatives.
> Even if storage keeps getting faster and cheaper stuff you can't ignore the
> overhead of adding yet another 8bytes to each tuple.
+1, very much.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company