On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 6:48 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> Document XLOG_INCLUDE_XID a little better
>
> I noticed that commit 0bead9af484c left this flag undocumented in
> XLogSetRecordFlags, which led me to discover that the flag doesn't
> actually do what the one comment on it said it does. Improve the
> situation by adding some more comments.
>
> Backpatch to 14, where the aforementioned commit appears.
I'm not sure that saying something is a "hack" is really all that
useful as documentation.
But more to the point, I think this hack is ugly and needs to be
replaced with something less hacky.
Amit?
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com