Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYkFYRnmTLgPLPm664UdQFBcJTcDZXzBP6dG0zTniYEWQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error  (Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6run@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Vacuum o/p with (full 1, parallel 0) option throwing an error
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 8, 2020 at 10:25 AM Mahendra Singh Thalor
<mahi6run@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think, Tushar point is that either we should allow both
> vacuum(parallel 0, full 1) and vacuum(parallel 1, full 0) or in the
> both cases, we should through error.

Oh, yeah, good point. Somebody must not've been careful enough with
the options-checking code.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Следующее
От: Tomas Vondra
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort