On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> I'd say no:
>>
>> 1. You don't know the granularity of the filesystem's timestamps, at least
>> not without making unportable assumptions.
>>
>> 2. There's no guarantee that the system clock can't be set backwards.
>>
>> 3. It's not uncommon for filesystems to have optimizations whereby they
>> skip or delay some updates of file mtimes. (I think this is usually
>> optional, but you couldn't know whether it's turned on.)
>>
>> #2 is probably the worst of these problems.
>
> Or upwards. A simple example of things depending on clock changes is
> for example VM snapshotting. Any logic not depending on monotonic
> timestamps, with things like clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC) is a lot
> of fun to investigate until you know that they are not using any
> monotonic logic... So the answer is *no*, do not depend on FS-level
> timestamps. The only sane method for Postgres is really to scan the
> page header LSNs, and of course you already know that.
It might also be worth noting that the FSM is not WAL-logged, so it
probably either doesn't have page LSNs or they are not meaningful.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers