On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Honestly, I am still not convinced that the centralized sequence server with
> no local caching is something we should be optimizing for as that one will
> suffer from performance problems anyway. And it can ignore the last_value
> input from postgres if it choses to, so it's not like the currently proposed
> patch forbids implementation of such AMs.
I can buy that.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company