Re: apply_scanjoin_target_to_paths and partitionwise join
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: apply_scanjoin_target_to_paths and partitionwise join |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmoYhUtGLx6phmxNMo0bsOMJabiOzNTJEmAma7se=H89GcA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: apply_scanjoin_target_to_paths and partitionwise join (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: apply_scanjoin_target_to_paths and partitionwise join
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thanks for writing back. I only just noticed this thread again. On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 5:53 AM Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote: > My patch removed a redundant SET enable_partitionwise_join = on. That > change is not included in your commit, I believe, because it's > irrelevant to the fix. However, it's better to avoid the redundancy to > avoid confusion. PFA patch for the same. Yeah, I couldn't really understand your test case changes, so I basically redid those from scratch. I personally think that the regression tests are kind of horrible about how they use SET enable_* commands. It's often extremely difficult to figure out what the current values are at any given point in what may be a very long test case file. I don't have an opinion at the present time on whether changing this makes it more or less confusing. > [3] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/786.1565541557%40sss.pgh.pa.us This is a really interesting link. Your email contained no reference to this footnote (unless I missed something) but it seems quite relevant to this discussion. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: