On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 5/31/16 1:47 PM, Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>
>> Are we going to change synchronous_standby_names? Certainly the GUC is
>> not *only* a list of names anymore.
>>
>> synchronous_standby_config?
>> synchronous_standbys (adjust to correct english if necesary)?
>
>
> If the existing values are still going to be accepted, then I would leave it
> as is.
+1, emphatically.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company