Re: Little cleanup of ShmemInit function names
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Little cleanup of ShmemInit function names |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYgjFreVtAN+du0EP8gsB98HkAnTCf4=9g_G_PY4HYq2Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Little cleanup of ShmemInit function names (Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 28, 2024 at 2:41 PM Andreas Karlsson <andreas@proxel.se> wrote: > Not sure if it is correct or not but from some googling it seems to be a > direct translation of "quod vide". I think "for which, see" would likely > be more proper English but it is not my native language and we use > "which see" elsewhere so we might as well be consistent and use "which see". If somebody wrote "for which, see" in a patch I was reviewing, I would definitely complain about it. I wouldn't complain about "which see", but that's mostly because I know Tom likes the expression. As a native English speaker, it sounds basically grammatical to me, but it's an extremely uncommon usage. I prefer to phrase things in ways that are closer to how people actually talk, partly because I know that we do have many people working on the project who are not native speakers of English, and are thus more likely to be tripped up by obscure usages. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: