Re: [PATCH] Log crashed backend's query (activity string)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [PATCH] Log crashed backend's query (activity string)
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYg-7w15KpvkzgjJGj6Wjuuf9uimZonKH3yBs1bN9Seug@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Log crashed backend's query (activity string)  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Log crashed backend's query (activity string)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems like everyone agrees that this feature is wanted, but Tom is
> still very much opposed to the general approach to implement it, as
> being too dangerous.
> Is it the reviewer's job to try to convince him otherwise?

It's not the reviewer's job to convince Tom of anything in particular,
but I think it's helpful for them to state their opinion, whatever it
may be (agreeing with Tom, disagreeing with Tom, or whatever).

IMHO, the most compelling argument against the OP's approach made so
far is the encoding issue.  I was hoping someone (maybe the OP?) would
have an opinion on that, an idea how to work around it, or something.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dimitri Fontaine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Satisfy extension dependency by one of multiple extensions
Следующее
От: Dimitri Fontaine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Unlogged vs. In-Memory