On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 7:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I suppose Robert had something more intelligent in mind than a tight
> loop when the buffer can't be exclusively locked, so maybe there is
> some other change that should be made here instead.
My intention was to skip the tuple, but I failed to notice the unusual
way in which this loop iterates. How about something like the
attached?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company