On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 4:22 AM, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 09:38:38AM +0300, Sergei Kornilov wrote:
>> Currently log_autovacuum_min_duration log message has no difference
>> between regular autovacuum and to prevent wraparound autovacuum. There
>> are important differences, for example, backend can automatically
>> cancel regular autovacuum, but not anti-wraparound. I think it is
>> useful indicate anti-wraparound in logs.
>
> Yes, a bit more verbosity would be nice for that. Using the term
> "anti-wraparound" directly in the logs makes the most sense?
I'm not particularly in love with that terminology. I doubt that it's
very clear to the average user.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company