On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> No matter what we end up doing here it will be consistent with
>> something; I am reminded of the phrase "the good thing about standards
>> is that there are so many to choose from...".
>
> Well, FWIW I vote for making the new columns be float8 msec. If you
> don't want to change total_time to match, I guess there's no law that
> says it *has* to be consistent ...
Ugh. So the three ways of doing timing that we have already aren't
enough, and we need a fourth one? Ack!
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company