Re: Online verification of checksums

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Online verification of checksums
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYb4MOdiyda2E8yJm40nhyFarVkRdS7R3enTbNuwTtigw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Online verification of checksums  (Michael Banck <michael.banck@credativ.de>)
Ответы Re: Online verification of checksums
Re: Online verification of checksums
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:37 AM Michael Banck
<michael.banck@credativ.de> wrote:
> I have added a retry for this as well now, without a pg_sleep() as well.
> This catches around 80% of the half-reads, but a few slip through. At
> that point we bail out with exit(1), and the user can try again, which I
> think is fine?

Maybe I'm confused here, but catching 80% of torn pages doesn't sound
robust at all.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Li, Zheng"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: NOT IN subquery optimization
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why don't we have a small reserved OID range for patch revisions?