Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYZGn4xYEmT67CQ-knc0kSoiauFbkWXSg0P2=rw3OjYWQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c  (Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: proposal: multiple psql option -c
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:53 PM, Catalin Iacob <iacobcatalin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I wrote some text. But needs some work of native speaker.
>>
>> It does.  It would be nice if some kind reviewer could help volunteer
>> to clean that up.
>
> I'll give it a go sometime next week.

Thanks, that would be great!

I recommend comparing the section on -c and the section on -C, and
probably updating the former as well as adjusting the wording of the
latter.  We don't want to repeat all the same details in both places,
but we hopefully want to give people a little clue that if they're
thinking about using -c, they may wish to instead consider -C.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Adrian.Vondendriesch"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [BUGS] BUG #12989: pg_size_pretty with negative values
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Brain fade in gin_extract_jsonb_path()