Re: storing an explicit nonce

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: storing an explicit nonce
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYYseXmPrSDJ5HBfgSr1O0cZPAJk2M2GzdVe+KWQZ7PeQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: storing an explicit nonce  (Ashwin Agrawal <ashwinstar@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: storing an explicit nonce  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 3:31 PM Ashwin Agrawal <ashwinstar@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not at all knowledgeable on security topics (bravely using terms and recommendation), can we approach decisions like
AES-XTSvs AES-GCM (which in turn decides whether we need to store nonce or not) based on which compliance it can
achieveor not. Like can using AES-XTS make it FIPS 140-2 compliant or not? 

To the best of my knowledge, the encryption mode doesn't have much to
do with whether such compliance can be achieved. The encryption
algorithm could matter, but I assume everyone still thinks AES is
acceptable. (We should assume that will eventually change.) The
encryption mode is, at least as I understand, more of an internal
thing that you have to get right to avoid having people break your
encryption and write papers about how they did it.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Mark Dilger
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Role Self-Administration
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: storing an explicit nonce