Re: Relation extension scalability

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Relation extension scalability
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYYgyHBtn8efrd0A0aNH8ZV9icoh9b_RtmOHTdqKTThTg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Relation extension scalability  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Relation extension scalability  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 11:49 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think one thing which needs more thoughts about this approach is that we
> need to maintain some number of slots so that group extend for different
> relations can happen in parallel.  Do we want to provide simultaneous
> extension for 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or more number of relations?  I think providing
> it for three or four relations should be okay as higher the number we want
> to provide, bigger the size of PGPROC structure will be.

Hmm.  Can we drive this off of the heavyweight lock manager's idea of
how big the relation extension lock wait queue is, instead of adding
more stuff to PGPROC?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: The plan for FDW-based sharding
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CustomScan in a larger structure (RE: CustomScan support on readfuncs.c)