On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/6/30 Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>:
>> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> 2013/6/30 Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet@singh.im>:
>>> > On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Pavel Stehule
>>> > <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > How about naming those 3 variables as follows:
>>> >
>>> > root_expr_kind
>>> > root_expr_name
>>> > root_bool_expr_type
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>>
>> Thanks. Attached is the patch with that change. I'll update the commitfest
>> entry with a link to this email.
>
> ok
>
> I chechecked it - patched without warnings, all tests passed
>
> It is ready for commit
I think it's a waste of code to try to handle bushy trees. A list is
not a particularly efficient representation of the pending list; this
will probably be slower than recusing in the common case. I'd suggest
keeping the logic to handle left-deep trees, which I find rather
elegant, but ditching the pending list.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company