Re: [HACKERS] JIT compiling - v4.0

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] JIT compiling - v4.0
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYTyGqrusrQGZ6fzjO3zj0hFibhuarvNcsYNvgg77ao1A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] JIT compiling - v4.0  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:57 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> master q01 min: 14146.498     dev min: 11479.05 [diff -23.24]     dev-jit min: 8659.961 [diff -63.36]
dev-jit-deformmin: 7279.395 [diff -94.34]     dev-jit-deform-inline min: 6997.956 [diff -102.15]
 

I think this is a really strange way to display this information.
Instead of computing the percentage of time that you saved, you've
computed the negative of the percentage that you would have lost if
the patch were already committed and you reverted it.  That's just
confusing.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Optimise default partition scanning while adding newpartition
Следующее
От: Amit Langote
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] v10 bottom-listed