Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Assert that the correct locks are held whencalling PageGetLSN()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Assert that the correct locks are held whencalling PageGetLSN()
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYTNfA37J014ZQwRFx8355WC7mHF7c8g=-vUCFQHsV-=A@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Assert that the correct locks are held whencalling PageGetLSN()  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Assert that the correct locks are held whencalling PageGetLSN()  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> So those bits could be considered for integration.

Yes, and they also tend to suggest that the rest of the patch has value.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] parallelize queries containing initplans
Следующее
От: Alexander Korotkov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017 : Patch for predicate locking in Gist index