On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Tomas Vondra <tv@fuzzy.cz> wrote:
> attached is a patch that improves performance when dropping multiple
> tables within a transaction. Instead of scanning the shared buffers for
> each table separately, the patch removes this and evicts all the tables
> in a single pass through shared buffers.
>
> Our system creates a lot of "working tables" (even 100.000) and we need
> to perform garbage collection (dropping obsolete tables) regularly. This
> often took ~ 1 hour, because we're using big AWS instances with lots of
> RAM (which tends to be slower than RAM on bare hw). After applying this
> patch and dropping tables in groups of 100, the gc runs in less than 4
> minutes (i.e. a 15x speed-up).
>
> This is not likely to improve usual performance, but for systems like
> ours, this patch is a significant improvement.
Seems pretty reasonable. But instead of duplicating so much code,
couldn't we find a way to use replace DropRelFileNodeAllBuffers with
DropRelFileNodeAllBuffersList? Surely anyone who was planning to call
the first one could instead call the second one with a count of one
and a pointer to the address of the data they were planning to pass.
I'd probably swap the order of arguments to
DropRelFileNodeAllBuffersList as well. We could do something similar
with smgrdounlink/smgrdounlinkall so that, again, only one copy of the
code is needed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company