Re: [PATCH] Skip ALTER x SET SCHEMA if the schema didn't change

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [PATCH] Skip ALTER x SET SCHEMA if the schema didn't change
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYPKu9a+9j4r_pPCVTwFC=hUkdPz8124YS5jfSe1u2wXQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH] Skip ALTER x SET SCHEMA if the schema didn't change  (Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH] Skip ALTER x SET SCHEMA if the schema didn't change
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Haribabu Kommi <kommi.haribabu@gmail.com> wrote:
> I went through the patch, following are my observations,
>
> Patch applied with hunks and compiled with out warnings.
> Basic tests are passed.

I'm interested in hearing opinions from multiple people about the
following two questions:

1. Is the new behavior better than the old behavior?
2. Will breaking backward compatibility make too many people unhappy?

My guess is that the answer to the first question is "yes" and that
the answer to the second one is "no", but this is clearly a
significant incompatibility, so I'd like to hear some more opinions
before concluding that we definitely want to do this.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Beta2 Next week
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Note about comparation PL/SQL packages and our schema/extensions