Re: On disable_cost
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: On disable_cost |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYOOy+C9mkt9aC_mPuwTRn2TX8+-UnMW3cbUzbheN1TaA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | On disable_cost (Zhenghua Lyu <zlv@pivotal.io>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 2:20 PM Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote: > I don't think extension maintainers necessarily have the same level of > PostgreSQL internals as you or many of the other people who frequent > -hackers, so I think it's fair for them to ask questions or raise issues > with patches they don't understand. I was able to glean from the commit > message that this was the commit that likely changed the behavior in > pgvector, but I can't immediately glean looking through the code as to > why. (And using your logic, should an extension maintainer understand > the optimizer code when PostgreSQL is providing an interface to the > extension maintainer to encapsulate its interactions)? > > You can always push back and say "Well, maybe try this, or try that" - > which would be a mentoring approach that could push it back on the > extension maintainer, which is valid, but I don't see why an extension > maintainer can't raise an issue or ask a question here. I'm certainly not saying that extension maintainers can't raise issues or ask questions here. I just feel that the problem could have been analyzed a bit more before posting. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: