Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup?
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYNPMSq2wmw8wi1-oJ0ga4BuPMVPfZrhpEBT+FRpBbyew@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup?
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 5:51 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> I like this idea so much that I already proposed it in the past[1], so +1.
>
> [1] https://postgr.es/m/20160826202911.GA320593@alvherre.pgsql

Hey, look at that. I think I had some vague recollection of a prior
proposal, but I couldn't remember exactly who or exactly what had been
proposed. I do think that pg_ctl is too long a prefix, though. People
can get used to typing 'pg createdb' instead of 'createdb' but 'pg_ctl
createdb' seems like too much. At least, it would very very quickly
cause me to install aliases.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: where should I stick that backup?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Support for DATETIMEOFFSET