Re: 9.5 Release press coverage
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 9.5 Release press coverage |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYL_3U2+6XK=E2nH9r3x3C3=seATXGY-8+REAKJFUZC0A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 9.5 Release press coverage ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: 9.5 Release press coverage
(damien@dalibo.info)
Re: 9.5 Release press coverage (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>) Re: 9.5 Release press coverage (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>) Re: 9.5 Release press coverage (Umair Shahid <umair.shahid@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > The rest of us (CMD, 2Q, OmniTI, etc...) are all just service providers. EDB > is the only "distribution" of PostgreSQL. From a technical point of view, it certainly isn't. There are certainly other companies distributing PostgreSQL, in source code, in RPM form, and maybe even in fat client installers, though I don't know of anyone else doing that last one at the moment. But from a PR point of view, I'm not sure how many other PostgreSQL companies have dedicated PR departments as EnterpriseDB does. I suspect, although I do not know, that a journalist who gets a press contact from PostgreSQL is much more likely to get that contact from an EnterpriseDB staff member than an employee of any other PostgreSQL company, because we pay multiple people to do that kind of thing. I can say categorically that it is the intention of EnterpriseDB management and of the people who work in our marketing department to promote both PostgreSQL and EnterpriseDB, not just EnterpriseDB. I can also say that the people who work in our marketing department, and particularly Renee Deger with whom I have worked a good deal, are people of integrity who sincerely intend to do the right thing not only for EnterpriseDB but also for PostgreSQL. That does not mean they always get it right, but they sincerely try, and implying otherwise is unfair. However, EnterpriseDB's PR staff is paid by EnterpriseDB. And that means that, while they talk about EnterpriseDB and PostgreSQL, they typically don't spend a lot of time talking about other PostgreSQL companies. Frankly, I think that's pretty fair. I suspect that when 2ndQuadrant or Dalibo or PGExperts or CommandPrompt or OmniTI puts out a PostgreSQL-related press release or does an interview for a trade rag about PostgreSQL, they don't typically say "now let me tell you about EnterpriseDB, who also contributes to the PostgreSQL community". And that's pretty fair too. There's nothing to prevent any company that wants from hiring just as many PR people as EnterpriseDB has, or even more, and giving just as many interviews to the press as we do. And I bet that, if they do, some of those interviews will come off sounding like that company is the only PostgreSQL company, too. In fact, here are a few other links where only a single PostgreSQL company is mentioned, found with a quick search of Google News: http://www.computing.co.uk/ctg/news/2347067/met-office-selects-2ndquadrant-to-help-with-data-migration-to-open-source http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/ibm-unveils-linux-only-mainframe-builds-on-linux-success-300129060.html http://www.infodsi.com/articles/153522/dalibo-propose-formations-gratuites-postgresql.html Now, from any of those articles, you could easily conclude, if you didn't know better, that the PostgreSQL company mentioned in the article is the only one that exists. It's certainly the case, in each instance, that no other company is mentioned besides the one quoted, and there's no disclaimer, hey, we're just one company in the community. I don't think any PostgreSQL company is obliged to insert such a disclaimer into every interview. You couldn't get the journalists to take them anyway, certainly not in every case. And why should anybody even be obliged to try? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: