Re: [HACKERS] Dropping partitioned table drops a previously detached partition

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Dropping partitioned table drops a previously detached partition
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYKjqFPrLZxyPDE5SAb38SXv+=+_KSqN4HsUECi0Oipqw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Dropping partitioned table drops a previously detached partition  (Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Dropping partitioned table drops a previously detached partition  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 9:44 AM, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have added tests to the
> 0001-Dependency-between-partitioned-table-and-partition_v1.patch. Please
> find attached the v2 patch.

Thanks.  Committed.  I don't think the 0002 patch is an improvement -
sure, it keeps those things in sync, but it also makes the code harder
to read.  On balance I think it's a negative.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] RTE_NAMEDTUPLESTORE, enrtuples and comments
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] RTE_NAMEDTUPLESTORE, enrtuples and comments