Re: Posix Shared Mem patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Posix Shared Mem patch
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYKQvNQQ2UM_U7OHOcPart+SUmVKL5-Ajgrw1oXcHcOfA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Posix Shared Mem patch  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: Posix Shared Mem patch  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Josh Berkus's message of mar jun 26 15:49:59 -0400 2012:
>> Robert, all:
>>
>> Last I checked, we had a reasonably acceptable patch to use mostly Posix
>> Shared mem with a very small sysv ram partition.  Is there anything
>> keeping this from going into 9.3?  It would eliminate a major
>> configuration headache for our users.
>
> I don't think that patch was all that reasonable.  It needed work, and
> in any case it needs a rebase because it was pretty old.

Yep, agreed.

I'd like to get this fixed too, but it hasn't made it up to the top of
my list of things to worry about.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: tuplesort memory usage: grow_memtuples
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: proof concept - access to session variables on client side