On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 5:29 AM Tatsuro Yamada
<tatsuro.yamada.tf@nttcom.co.jp> wrote:
> 17520|13599|postgres|16387|f|16387|scanning table|4425|4425
> 17520|13599|postgres|16387|f|16387|analyzing sample|0|0
> 17520|13599|postgres|16387|f|16387||0|0 <-- Is it Okay??
Why do we zero out the block numbers when we switch phases? The
CREATE INDEX progress reporting patch does that kind of thing too, and
it seems like poor behavior to me.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company