Re: [HACKERS] Current int & float overflow checking is slow.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Current int & float overflow checking is slow.
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYDBNX-PDHQiiwrhGjsxbVLmOAn_yRdQNVnYoLTGd_SGQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Current int & float overflow checking is slow.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Current int & float overflow checking is slow.  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 9:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I don't like changing well-defined, user-visible query behavior for
> no other reason than a performance gain (of a size that hasn't even
> been shown to be interesting, btw).  Will we change it back in another
> ten years if the performance tradeoff changes?
>
> Also, if I recall the old discussion properly, one concern was getting
> uniform behavior across different platforms.  I'm worried that if we do
> what Andres suggests, we'll get behavior that is not only different but
> platform-specific.  Now, to the extent that you believe that every modern
> platform implements edge-case IEEE float behavior the same way, that worry
> may be obsolete.  But I don't think I believe that.

Yeah, those are reasonable concerns.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Justin Pryzby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] unique index violation after pg_upgrade to PG10
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] unique index violation after pg_upgrade to PG10