On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Aleksander Alekseev
<a.alekseev@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> I still believe that optimizing 1% blindly without considering possible
> side effects this optimization can bring (other data alignment, some
> additional machine instructions - just to name a few) and having no
> way to measure these side effects is a bad idea. But I also admit a
> possibility that I can somehow be wrong on this. So I rewrote this
> patch one again :'( the way you suggested (without that alignment
> related hack I tried, it's just too ugly). I also attached original
> hashhdr-rmh.patch just to have both patches in one message so it would
> be easier to find both patches in this thread.
Thanks! I can't think of anything else to worry about with regards to
that version, so I have committed it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company