incorrect libpq comment
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | incorrect libpq comment |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+TgmoYBygEYgp0=X7y6ewZ8hj+tHmtYNf2FB1WAyi1wjg1-9Q@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: incorrect libpq comment
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce's commit 5d305d86bd917723f09ab4f15c075d90586a210a back in April
of 2014 includes this change:
/* See PQconnectPoll() for how we use 'int' and not 'pgsocket'. */
- int sock; /* Unix FD for socket, -1 if not connected */
+ pgsocket sock; /* FD for socket, PGINVALID_SOCKET if
unconnected */
I suppose Bruce must have overlooked the fact that the comment on the
previous line is now false. I think we should remove it, because it
makes no sense to say how we are using 'int' rather than 'pgsocket'
when in fact we are not using 'int' any more.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: