Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYA0v+gQxNT94Ru59=_v=Ha-8eOieKtxu+37gq4TZ7h=g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
Ответы Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 1:30 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
> How common is to get a failure?  I know I've run tests under
> EXEC_BACKEND and not seen any failures.  Not many runs though.

On macOS, failures are extremely common. Sometimes I have to run
simple tests many times to get even one success. The proposal on the
table won't help with that problem since it's Linux-specific, but if
there's any way to do something similar on macOS it would be a _huge_
help.

-- 
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?