Re: Issue with cancel_before_shmem_exit while searching to remove a particular registered exit callbacks
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Issue with cancel_before_shmem_exit while searching to remove a particular registered exit callbacks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoY8hrNE-sO+B95M8AD6CL9VohSMik2VZkrnkbANRDS5gw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Issue with cancel_before_shmem_exit while searching to remove a particular registered exit callbacks (Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Issue with cancel_before_shmem_exit while searching to remove a particular registered exit callbacks
Re: Issue with cancel_before_shmem_exit while searching to remove a particular registered exit callbacks |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 11:46 PM Bharath Rupireddy <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote: > I sent the patch previously[1], but attaching here again, modifies > cancel_before_shmem_exit() function comment to reflect the safe usage > of before_shmem_exit_list callback mechanism and also removes the > point "For simplicity, only the latest entry can be removed*********" > as this gives a meaning that there is still scope for improvement in > cancel_before_shmem_exit() search mechanism. > > Thoughts? I think that the first part of the comment change you suggest is a good idea and would avoid developer confusion, but I think that the statement about unordered removal of comments being risky doesn't add much. It's too vague to help anybody and I don't think I believe it, either. So I suggest something more like: - * callback. For simplicity, only the latest entry can be - * removed. (We could work harder but there is no need for - * current uses.) + * callback. We only look at the latest entry for removal, as we + * expect the caller to use before_shmem_exit callback mechanism + * in the LIFO order. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: