On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 2:49 PM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn@amazon.com> wrote:
> Yeah, I agree. What about
> huge_pages_needed_for_shared_memory_size or
> huge_pages_needed_for_main_shared_memory? I'm still not stoked about
> using "required" or "needed" in the name, as it sounds like huge pages
> must be allocated for the server to run, which is only true if
> huge_pages=on. I haven't thought of a better word to use, though.
I prefer the first of those to the second. I don't find it
particularly better or worse than my previous suggestion of
shared_memory_size_in_huge_pages.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com