On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> While studying lmgr code, I noticed that there are a couple of places
> that use 1 << x to convert a LOCKMODE to a LOCKMASK instead of the
> macro that is used elsewhere. Should that be changed for consistency,
> as in the attached?
Sure, why not?
Committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company