Re: [RFC] grants vs. inherited tables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [RFC] grants vs. inherited tables
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoY2_JqYMuSLsvYgfZ-TEFbN+5jN4j+7dWNA8wMVXWu1xQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [RFC] grants vs. inherited tables  (Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have the (hopefully wrong) impression that you're missing the fact
>> that it already exists, at least in 9.0.
>
> You are right, I missed it.  For quite obvious reason:
>
>  $ grep -ri aclexplode doc/
>  $
>
> Is there a good reason why it's undocumented?  Internal/unstable API?
> I better avoid it then.  But I would like to have this or similar
> function as part of public API.

I don't see any real reason why we couldn't document this one.  It
returns OIDs, but that's the name of the game if you're doing anything
non-trivial with PostgreSQL system catalogs.  Off-hand I'm not quite
sure which section of the documentation would be appropriate, though.
It looks like the functions we provide are mostly documented in
chapter 9, Functions and Operators.  Section 9.23 on "System
Information Functions" seems like it's probably the closest fit...

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Следующее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2