Re: Non-Compete Challenges for Community Work
| От | Dave Page |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Non-Compete Challenges for Community Work |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+OCxozvGs4dA5hcKkffedBwUVET47OZLiXoztk8ON7e8ap8Jg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Non-Compete Challenges for Community Work (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Non-Compete Challenges for Community Work
|
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 at 14:20, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2025 at 8:24 AM Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> Agreed - and companies like pgEdge and EDB have policies and often employment contracts that specifically encourage contributions.
I'm kind of surprised by the direction of this conversation, because
I'm aware of some problematic cases. Even if none of us were, that
wouldn't mean that there are no problems. People are going to be
understandably reluctant to discuss their terms of employment
publicly.
I don't think she's wrong - I just think the issue is much smaller than suggested and that there are likely better places to spend time, effort, and money at the moment (such as, I believe, the average age of our contributors being on the rise). More and more jurisdictions seem to be banning non-competes (or regularly ruling against them) for employees, so it seems to me that the problem is slowly going away anyway.
Dave Page
pgAdmin: https://www.pgadmin.org
PostgreSQL: https://www.postgresql.org
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: