On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On 06.05.2012 19:05, Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> Sounds fine - but I'm not keen on making such changes in the back
>> branches. Can we fix the current problem, and re-architect for 9.2
>> please?
>
>
> We don't really have back-branches for pldebugger. Or versioned releases,
Right - that's because it's only had minor bug fixes until now.
> for that matter. I'll fix this in git master. I consider the current tip of
> the old CVS repository (or the corresponding checkout from the git repo) to
> be the latest stable release, PostgreSQL one-click installers <= 9.1 can
> continue to use that version.
Can you create a "PRE-9_2" branch for the current architecture, and
apply Ashesh's patch to that if you think it's a reasonable fix
please? We can then move the older builds to that branch. Then the 9.2
changes can go on master.
> We probably should tag and put out a versioned release of pldebugger on
> pgxn, sometime during the PostgreSQL 9.2 beta period, so that it's ready
> when PostgreSQL 9.2 is released.
Yeah.
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company