Re: Greenplum 6.x Support
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Greenplum 6.x Support |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+OCxoytGv2p6vM4iw5xYL8xYDymLUrM6ym0aGqLqhBo4=4mjA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Greenplum 6.x Support (<Harald.Immerheiser@RUV.de>) |
Список | pgadmin-support |
i am working with Greenplum and pgadmin4 is my favorite tool every day since 2018.
Based on the GPDB5 support in Version 2.0 i did some (dirty) patches to get pgadmin4 useable with GPDB4. But that is history, we are on GPDB6 since 2020.
I hoped for an official support for GPDB6 but now i fear that the inofficial support will be dropped by housekeeping.
Please do not drop the gpdb-code.
I only need a few patches to work on GPDB6 with pgadmin4.
There are some uncritical Changes in Python-Code and additional SQL for GPDB6 in new directories.
Then there is a dirty patch because it may break something with other server_type than gpdb. This works for me but it is not a general solution.
It would be better to improve the way how sql_template_path ist set in "pgadmin4/web/pgadmin/browser/server_groups/servers/databases/schemas/tables/utils.py"
and " pgadmin4/web/pgadmin/browser/server_groups/servers/databases/schemas/functions/__init__.py"
and "pgadmin4/web/pgadmin/browser/server_groups/servers/databases/schemas/__init__.py"
Someone who is familiar with this framework will find a better solution.
Without this patch i cannot display dependencies or dependents:
depends/gpdb/#90424#/dependents.sql
and functions:
ERROR: column "proiswin" does not exist
LINE 5: proiswin, provolatile, proisstrict, prosecdef,
I am willing to work on Greenplum issues that may come up in the future. It will be easy if it can be done with a server specific SQL and the modules sql_temlplate_path supports server_type, but i need help if there ist something to do in Python-code.
В списке pgadmin-support по дате отправления: