On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> On 5/22/13 7:45 AM, Dave Page wrote:
>> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 5:06 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>>> I think Homebrew is established enough by now that it deserves to be
>>> mentioned.
>>
>> Given our conversation last night, I think we should firm up a listing
>> policy before adding Homebrew to that page. I would suggest that in
>> order to be listed in the primary package download pages, a package
>> must a) be maintained by someone on the packagers list, and b)
>> typically be published within the community release timetable.
>
> For practical purposes, that is me.
OK, so it's a fair assumption you'll work within the community
timetable and would therefore meet my suggested criteria. What do you
think of the policy in general?
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company