Dhiraj, can you look into this please?
Thanks.
On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Erwin Brandstetter
<brandstetter@falter.at> wrote:
> Hi developers!
>
> I have been missing in action for a while, so I am not sure whether anybody
> even uses trac any more.
> Either way, I just ran into this bug once again and checked to find it still
> open:
> http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/ticket/88
>
> Basically, REVOKE EXECUTE ON FUNCTION is omitted in the DDL script.
> To reproduce:
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION foo() RETURNS int AS 'SELECT 1' LANGUAGE sql;
> REVOKE EXECUTE ON FUNCTION foo() FROM public;
>
> This is a **potential security hazard** and it has been open for (at least)
> over a year now.
>
> Regards
> Erwin
>
>
>
> On 27.02.2012 23:53, Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
>
> On 27.02.2012 23:38, Erwin Brandstetter wrote:
>
> Hi developers!
>
> Congratulations on the many bug fixes in the latest release!
> I think I found another serious problem.
>
> Testing with pgAdmin 1.14.2 on Windows XP. Server is PostgreSQL 9.1 on
> Devian Squeeze.
>
> There is a security hazard lingering in the reverse engineered SQL of the
> latest version 1.14.2 (and versions before it).
>
> As summed up here
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/sql-createfunction.html#SQL-CREATEFUNCTION-SECURITY
> the execute privilege is granted to PUBLIC by default. It needs to be
> revoked for security critical functions.
>
> I quote the manual:
>
> Another point to keep in mind is that by default, execute privilege is
> granted to PUBLIC for newly created functions (see GRANT for more
> information). Frequently you will wish to restrict use of a security definer
> function to only some users. To do that, you must revoke the default PUBLIC
> privileges and then grant execute privilege selectively.
>
>
> This goes wrong with pgAdmin 1.14.2. Consider this test case, executed as
> superuser postgres:
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION foo ()
> RETURNS void AS
> $BODY$
> BEGIN
> PERFORM 1;
> END;
> $BODY$
> LANGUAGE plpgsql VOLATILE SECURITY DEFINER;
> ALTER FUNCTION foo() SET search_path=public, pg_temp;
> REVOKE ALL ON FUNCTION foo() FROM PUBLIC;
> GRANT EXECUTE ON FUNCTION foo() TO ief;
>
>
> The reverse engineered SQL looks like this
>
> -- Function: foo()
>
> -- DROP FUNCTION foo();
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION foo()
> RETURNS void AS
> $BODY$
>
> BEGIN
> PERFORM 1;
> END;
> $BODY$
> LANGUAGE plpgsql VOLATILE SECURITY DEFINER
> COST 100;
> ALTER FUNCTION foo() SET search_path=public, pg_temp;
>
> ALTER FUNCTION foo()
> OWNER TO postgres;
> GRANT EXECUTE ON FUNCTION foo() TO postgres;
> GRANT EXECUTE ON FUNCTION foo() TO ief;
>
>
> The REVOKE statement is missing, which is a serious security hazard. A
> recreated function will be open to the the public.
>
> Regards
> Erwin
>
>
> I reopened ticket #88 for that
> http://code.pgadmin.org/trac/ticket/88#comment:2
> because it seemed closely related.
>
> Regards
> Erwin
>
>
>
--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company