Re: Why is there no 8.3.16 rpm with _id ?

Hi<br /><br />pgsql-www really isn't the list for this. I'd suggest -general.<br /><br />On Sunday, October 30, 2011,
hubertdepesz lubaczewski <<a href="mailto:depesz@depesz.com">depesz@depesz.com</a>> wrote:<br />> hi,<br />
>we'd like to upgrade to newest 8.3, and we're on 8.3.11 _id, but it<br />> looks like 8.3.11 is the newest
versionof 8.3 built with integer<br />> datetimes:<br />> <a
href="http://yum.postgresql.org/8.3/redhat/rhel-5-x86_64-id/repoview/">http://yum.postgresql.org/8.3/redhat/rhel-5-x86_64-id/repoview/</a><br
/>><br />> Is there any reason for this, and will there be any newer versions built<br />> with integer
datetimes?<br/>><br />> Best regards,<br />><br />> depesz<br />><br />> --<br />> The best thing
aboutmodern society is how easy it is to avoid contact with it.<br /> >                                            
               <a href="http://depesz.com/">http://depesz.com/</a><br />><br />> --<br />> Sent via pgsql-www
mailinglist (<a href="mailto:pgsql-www@postgresql.org">pgsql-www@postgresql.org</a>)<br /> > To make changes to your
subscription:<br/>> <a
href="http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www">http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-www</a><br/>><br /><br
/>--<br />Dave Page<br />Blog: <a href="http://pgsnake.blogspot.com" target="_blank">http://pgsnake.blogspot.com</a><br
/>Twitter: @pgsnake<br /><br />EnterpriseDB UK: <a href="http://www.enterprisedb.com"
target="_blank">http://www.enterprisedb.com</a><br/>The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company<br /><br />