Re: d25ea01275 and partitionwise join

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Langote
Тема Re: d25ea01275 and partitionwise join
Дата
Msg-id CA+HiwqHcjFCzzRfht2qs_Dwhia0wBsv1MS8Kwb62dWt1vR+4iw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: d25ea01275 and partitionwise join  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: d25ea01275 and partitionwise join  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 8:18 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 2:00 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> Just to leave a breadcrumb in this thread --- the planner failure
> >> induced by d25ea01275 has been fixed in 529ebb20a.  The difficulty
> >> with multiway full joins that Amit started this thread with remains
> >> open, but I imagine the posted patches will need rebasing over
> >> 529ebb20a.
>
> > Here are the rebased patches.
>
> The cfbot shows these patches as failing regression tests.  I think
> it is just cosmetic fallout from 6ef77cf46 having changed EXPLAIN's
> choices of table alias names; but please look closer to confirm,
> and post updated patches.

Thanks for notifying.

Checked and indeed fallout from 6ef77cf46 seems to be the reason a
test is failing.

Updated patches attached.

Thanks,
Amit

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Julien Rouhaud
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Planning counters in pg_stat_statements (using pgss_store)
Следующее
От: Vik Fearing
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: proposal \gcsv