Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Amit Langote
Тема Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks
Дата
Msg-id CA+HiwqGGF=PNE6XhDcGriXGq6kEHnf7RZFRKSxeY7EGHCy=FhA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 3:30 PM Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> wrote:
> v13 is attached.

I noticed that the recent 641f3dffcdf's changes to
get_constraint_index() made it basically unusable for this patch's
purposes.

Reading in the thread that led to 641f3dffcdf why
get_constraint_index() was changed the way it was, I invented in the
attached updated patch a get_fkey_constraint_index() that is local to
ri_triggers.c for use by the new ri_ReferencedKeyExists(), replacing
get_constraint_index() that no longer gives it the index it's looking
for.

-- 
Amit Langote
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BufferAlloc: don't take two simultaneous locks
Следующее
От: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BufferAlloc: don't take two simultaneous locks